Kamis, 31 Desember 2015

Chicago Police Say No Credible Threat to City for NYE


Police on Thursday said there is no credible threat to the city of Chicago or any of the major New Year's Eve events taking place this year, but much of the city will see heightened security measures amid celebrations. 
“I’m confident that New Year’s Eve 2016 will be another great and successful event,” said Deputy Chief Steve Georgas.
Georgas encouraged revelers to report suspicious people or activity, but said extra officers will take to downtown streets and city neighborhoods ahead of the celebrations.
“In every neighborhood across the city, officers will be out to enforce the law,” he said.
Security was tight at New Year's Eve celebrations worldwide, in a response to high-profile attacks on public gatherings claimed by ISIS and other groups over the past year.
Hundreds of officers carrying long guns, radiation detecters and bomb-sniffing dogs were set to guard the expected 1 million revelers in Times Square, with New York City partygoers sent through a series of checkpoints. France deployed 11,000 police officers, military personnel and firefighters to Paris, a boost of 2,000 more than last year's New Year's Eve security presence.
Thousands are expected to attend the city’s new major outdoor bash Chi-Town Rising, but Georgas said authorities have been working with organizers since the beginning to ensure security at the event.
“Security and safety was at the forefront of everybody’s attention,” he said. “You just prepare and have contingencies in place and adjust.”
The security plan is one authorities have routinely used for holiday celebrations, but Georgas noted that resources from city neighborhoods will not be used for the extra downtown presence.
“These are things that have been at the forefront of law enforcement for a long time now,” Georgas said. “We just try to put plans in place to make sure that we can respond to, mitigate, and have a safe event for anybody.”

Mag Mile marchers remember victims of gun violence in Chicago




Bride and groom.Bride and groom Bride and groom Samantha Mead and David Isaacson, who will be married tonight, encounter the third walkout calling for the resignation of Chicago Mayor Emanuel and Cook County State's Attorney Anita Alvarez on Dec. 31, 2015.

Protesters.
ProtestersThe third city-wide walkout calling for the resignation of Chicago Mayor Emanuel and Cook County State's Attorney Anita Alvarez following a Chicago police shooting Dec. 31, 2015. 

Calling for resignation.
Calling for resignationLamon Reccord calls for the resignation of Chicago Mayor Emanuel and Cook County State's Attorney Anita Alvarez Dec. 31, 2015. 

Our Thoughts On Women's Health's Major Body-Positive Change



I never, never thought I’d see the day when a magazine like Women’s Health opted to remove a cornerstone phrase like “Bikini Body” from their covers. But that’s exactly what happened this week, when in her editor’s note for the January/February issue, editor-in-chief Amy Keller Laird announced that “Bikini Body” — and its judgy sister, “Drop Two Sizes” — would be banned fromWH covers.

Part of my shock comes from my personal history with the brand. My first job after college and graduate school was as the assistant to the then editor-in-chief of Men’s Health, who was famous for his cover strategy, and played a part in the 2005 creation of Women’s Health, of which he later became editorial director. On Men’s Health covers, everything was about abs. Six-pack abs, specifically; 1,293 ways to get six-pack abs, usually. His meetings about Women’s Health covers usually happened on a different floor of our office building, but it’s safe to assume that equally impressive multi-digit odd numbers were tossed around regarding equally difficult-to-achieve body goals.

In another job at a women’s health magazine that was not Women’s Health, other editors and I would meet monthly to brainstorm coverlines. The body-focused ones were hardest for me to come up with. “Sexy sundress arms” was a knockout success every spring.

The thing I quickly learned about the big, bold, oiled-up, exclamatory covers of these magazines was that they were essentially meaningless. They weren’t editorial content — they were billboards. Sure, they ideally reflected the spirit of the stories behind them (and sure, the American Society of Magazine Editorshad certain rules back then about whether you could advertise other brands on them), but it didn’t really matter what the covers said — it mattered how many people they lured in to buy them on newsstands. Of course, the stories inside may well be well-written, meaningful, and focused on subjects that actually improve readers’ lives (which is very true of much of the MH and WH content, written, edited, and designed by real pros I admire) — but not all of them are.
THE MAGAZINE COVERS WEREN’T EDITORIAL CONTENT — THEY WERE BILLBOARDS.

Which is why — while I’m proud of the team atWH for making a splashy, body-positive statement like this — I’m not so quick to interpret this as an earth-shattering, needle-moving change in the vast and sinister world of body-shaming messages that women have to deal with daily. Are they still going to run diets inside? Are they still going to help you “target” your “problem areas”? Let’s hope that as the negative messages on the cover begin to dwindle, so do the ones hiding behind it.

When I finally said goodbye to the world of print media and came to join the team at R29, one of the most refreshing things about my new gig was Refinery’s take on body image, health, and diet. Specifically, we don’t do diets, we never refer to weight loss as a goal readers should aspire to, and any fitness or nutrition tip-based stories we run are about feeling stronger, happier, more energetic, and all the other great benefits from living a healthy life that have zero to do with pounds on a scale. We literally have a column called The Anti-Diet Project. I can’t take credit for any of this — it was in place long before I started — but after years of being part of the bikini body, drop two sizes industrial complex, I’m really happy to be on this train.

Women’s Health, welcome aboard.

I asked a few R29 staffers for their take on this news as well. Here are their gut reactions.

“My gut reaction was 'Fucking FINALLY.' At R29 we obviously have strong feelings about the idea of a "bikini body" (which we distilled in our Take Back The Beach features this summer). So it's great to see Women's Health so strongly embrace this body-positive attitude.”

— Sarah Jacoby, associate editor, health & science

Women's Health has finally acknowledged something that their readers (and all women!) have known for a while now — the ‘bikini body’ is a myth and a construct perpetuated by the media, and has proven to be a source of shame rather than one of inspiration. Placing a moratorium on this term is certainly heartening, but what makes it less so is how long it took. I can only hope the magazine's overarching heteronormativity will be the next thing to go.”

— Sara Coughlin, editorial assistant, health & wellness

“My first reaction is: awesome. Growing up with phrases like ‘bikini body’ was considered normal, and it's easy to forget that this communicates that one has to have a type of body to wear a particular piece of clothing, which is clearly bullshit. (Not to mention, what is a bikini body, anyway? The phrase only serves to make women feel that their bodies are too imperfect for a precious piece of swimwear. Again, bullshit.) But while I'm all for the sentiment, I can't help but wonder why the magazine feels the need to announce their new stance; why don't they just stop putting the phrase in their magazine without patting themselves on the back? It feels a little bit like the Dove campaign body-positive pandering. That said, it's really a great move on the part of WH, so maybe I should just be thrilled that no more young women will have to face icky cover lines like, ‘Get a bikini body in 2 weeks!’”

— Rebecca Adams, senior editor, sex & relationships

"I give them major kudos for calling themselves out in this way. I admit, I've felt pretty burned by their constant use of this term. For me, the real issue was that every time you clicked on their website a pop-up ad appeared, trying to get you to sign up for their 21-Day Bikini Body Plan. In order to close the ad, you literally had to click a button saying, 'GET MY BIKINI BODY' or a teeny one that read, 'No thanks, I already have a bikini body.' Of course, it was illustrated with a photo of a thin woman — their definition of a bikini body — and every time I had to click on one of those buttons, it just felt like a slap in my not thin face. Maybe that sounds silly, but I'm a woman who's interested in health, and therefore I counted myself among the target readership of Women's Health. But the emphasis on thinness and the constant message that healthy equals thin was really alienating. I don't expect a miracle, but I do hope this shift in language is more than just appeasement. Rhetoric does matter, therefore this move is important and we should celebrate it. So, high five to Women's Health.Now let's hope they follow through and practice what they preach."

Mariuccia Mandelli, Italian Fashion Designer, Dies at 90



Mariuccia Mandelli, an Italian fashion designer whose long list of credits includes the shortest of achievements — she was widely described as having invented hot pants — died on Sunday at her home in Milan. She was 90. In a statement, Matteo Renzi, the Italian prime minister, paid tribute to Ms. Mandelli. Ms. Mandelli, a former schoolteacher and self-taught designer, founded the fashion house Krizia in the mid-1950s. She reigned for decades as “the godmother of classic Milanese fashion,” as Newsweek described her in 1987. One of Italy’s first ready-to-wear houses, Krizia — known for designs that combined wit, whimsy and wearability — helped secure the country’s place in the fashion firmament. At its height in the 1990s, Krizia was a $500-million-a-year business, with a string of retail shops worldwide and a spate of branded products that included eyeglasses, neckties, furniture and perfumes. Last year, its fortunes waning, the company was sold to the Chinese retail group Shenzhen Marisfrolg Fashion. Hallmarks of the Krizia style included classic tailoring — often entailing structured, sculptural shoulders — combined with a looser-fitting, comfortable cut throughout a garment. Ms. Mandelli had a passion for pleats, which could run in unorthodox directions, and for unusual materials, including metallics, rubber, snakeskin, eel skin and even cork. Krizia became especially well known for knitwear, and in particular for Ms. Mandelli’s sweaters bearing fanciful images of animals, a different one each season. (She was afraid of animals, she often said, and could beard them only as representations.) Over the years, the sweaters, which became highly collectible, featured a veritable Noah’s Ark: lions, tigers, leopards, parrots, toucans, elephants, dogs, cats, apes and dinosaurs. Ms. Mandelli was attracted to dimensional extremes. “Either very short or very long,” she told The New York Times in 1987. “Either tight or loose.” For her, the zenith of very-shortness came just before New Year’s 1971, when she introduced the garment that would come to be known as hot pants. Unlike conventional shorts, hot pants had no waistband and were often made of sumptuous fabrics like satin or velvet. They also had minimal vertical reach. While hot pants may simply have been a ubiquitous idea whose time had come, the fashion press, including Women’s Wear Daily in its obituary on Monday, overwhelmingly credits Ms. Mandelli with their invention. In a January 1971 article about the hot-pants phenomenon, The Times wrote: “Stores that got in early with the new craze are reporting a surprising amount of interest in their shorts departments, whether they’re calling the garment ‘Cool Pants’ (Bergdorf’s), ‘Shortcuts’ (Bloomingdale’s) or ‘Hot Pants’ (Ohrbach’s, Alexander’s). Cold weather seems not to be deterring women who want to be first with a new fad.” Husbands, The Times added, were also encouraging their wives to buy them. Ms. Mandelli was born in Bergamo, near Milan. A gifted amateur seamstress, she trained to be a teacher at her mother’s insistence. In the mid-’50s, after teaching school for several years, she was offered the use of a friend’s Rome apartment, rent-free, for six months. Advertisement Continue reading the main story Advertisement Continue reading the main story She quit her job, borrowed money, bought a sewing machine and set herself up, selling the clothes she made from the back of her Fiat 500. She named her company Krizia after a character in a dialogue by Plato about women’s vanity. In 1964, at the Palazzo Pitti in Florence, an all-black-and-white collection by Ms. Mandelli won a prestigious fashion prize, the Critica della Moda award, cementing Krizia’s international reputation. Over time, she became one of the few high-profile female designers for women who also created successful men’s wear collections. Ms. Mandelli made headlines in the mid-1990s when she was tried, along with executives of several other prominent Italian design houses, on charges of having bribed tax officials. (The defendants maintained that the officials had been extorting them.) Convicted, Ms. Mandelli received a suspended sentence; her conviction was later overturned. Information on Ms. Mandelli’s survivors was unavailable. Her husband, Aldo Pinto, whom she married in the 1960s, served for many years as Krizia’s chairman. Ms. Mandelli, who often described herself as a feminist and a socialist, owned a publishing house that issued Italian translations of books by writers like Virginia Woolf and Doris Lessing. She also founded and designed the K Club, a luxury resort on Barbuda in the Caribbean, whose guests have included Diana, Princess of Wales. If there was a unifying ethos underlying Ms. Mandelli’s fashion, it was, she said, that nothing should feel forced — neither for the designer nor for the wearer. “I would be ashamed to tell women, ‘You must dress like this or like that because it is the year’s fashion,’ ” she said in an interview quoted by The Chicago Tribune in 1987. “Everyone must dress as they like, provided that the dress becomes for them a second skin.”

Lilly Pulitzer Will Open at Oakbrook Center This Month

Bright, vacation-ready patterns are coming to a mall near you.



Lilly Pulitzer, the brand that offers resort wear with enough color to make a flamingo look drab, is opening its first local outpost. Set to debut later this month at Oakbrook Center (100 Oakbrook Center, Oak Brook,oakbrookcenter.com), the company’s new store will have a peppy interior with a hand-painted design featuring mermaids hiding in ocean waves. There will also be a dressing room with a “Chicago” theme and an area for kids’ merchandise called “Little Lilly.”
Opening stock will include shifts, maxi dresses, shorts, scarves, and tote bags from the Resort Fall 2015 collection. As always, expect colors and prints galore. Jane Paradis, vice president of marketing and creative communications for the brand, says, “We love the bright colors, hidden motifs, and the conversations that [prints] create.” Patterns display everything from pink zebra stripes to hidden alligators and green parrots.
Though the tropical-feeling items can, of course, be worn in Chicago, the target customer is vacation-bound. As Paradis puts it: “We know our Chicago-area consumer tends to visit our stores on the west coast of Florida, and we’re ready to offer her the Lilly she loves before she packs her suitcase for that trip.”

30 Times A Celebrity Shocked Us On A Red Carpet In 2015

Jada Pinkett Smith & Will Smith
Where: Rihanna's Diamond Ball in Los Angeles, California

When: December 10, 2015

Oh, we SEE you, Will.

30 Times A Celebrity Shocked Us On A Red Carpet In 2016



Miley Cyrus

Where: MTV Video Music Awards in Los Angeles, California

When: August 30, 2015

At this point, though, she's just bein' Miley.